Two alleged get-rich-quick ‘guru’ courses and their operators are being sued by Amazon

Two shady Amazon get-rich-quick-style gurus and their companies’ marketing and selling courses for the Amazon platform are coming under fire from Amazon itself for trademark infringement.

Amazon is taking to task two gurus using Amazon’s trademarks without their permission. Typically Amazon won’t target someone if the trademark usage is of fair use, but I imagine these two received special attention from the army of Amazon lawyers because of the woefully lacking reputation these two groups carry.

It’s worth pointing out that these lawsuits not only go after the misuse of Amazon’s trademarks but the relation to the misuse with the perceived lack of value and misleading information the educators provide.

…persuade unwitting entrepreneurs to spend thousands of dollars on seminars and training programs of little, if any, value…

The first target is Prime Global Source, LLC, and many other companies they believe are connected to this operation. The lawsuit, filed on October 18, 2019, in The United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, alleges that the defendant used elements of the Amazon Prime trademark inappropriately and “whose purpose is to persuade unwitting entrepreneurs to spend thousands of dollars on seminars and training programs of little if any, value. Defendants accomplish this objective in part by misleading consumers into believing that they are affiliated with, Inc. (“Amazon”) by using logos that are confusingly similar or nearly identical to Amazon’s distinctive trademarks (“Amazon Marks”).”

The full text of the lawsuit can be read at the bottom of the page.

Specifically, Amazon is concerned with the likeness of PGS’ logo and other branding usages to the Amazon Smile mark, the curved arrow-line mark that represents a smile and is implemented in several of Amazon’s trademarks.

Screen Shot 2019 10 25 at 7.14.22 PM
Screen Shot 2019 10 25 at 7.21.51 PM
Screen Shot 2019 10 25 at 7.14.26 PM
source: page 11 and 12 of the Amazon/PGS lawsuit

As of this writing, PGS has not updated its homepage to remove the logo and other marks cited in the lawsuit (image below).

Screenshot_2019-10-25 Prime Global Source Professional ECommerce
Prime Global Source’s homepage as of October 25, 2019 (source:

And if it couldn’t get any more intense, the lawsuit also features student complaints, saying things like:

[after] securing nearly $22,500 from me, PGS became unresponsive…


I paid $1,495 for help to create my legal entity…after they charged my credit card, they disappeared…I learned later that [the coach that sold me the membership] was not even a PGS employee


I bought thousands of dollars worth of inventory from one of their wholesalers…they still haven’t delivered the products [after six months].

The second target is The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle on October 18, 2019, targets Online Secrets, Inc., Michael Gazzola, Matthew Behdjou et al., because it used the Amazon logo directly on its landing page, as seen in the image below. The full lawsuit is attached at the bottom of the page.

Screen Shot 2019 10 25 at 6.37.50 PM scaled
The exhibit from the lawsuit documenting the use of Amazon’s logo (page 12)

The “secrets” imparted to students involve violating Amazon’s third-party seller agreements through the use of fake product reviews…

The lawsuit opens up by alleging that the defendant(s) “have exploited Amazon’s brand to perpetrate a widespread get-rich-quick scheme that revolves around seeking to fake and inducing others to fake, product reviews, and other dishonest techniques that violate Amazon’s third-party seller agreements. Through deceptive marketing, Defendants use high-pressure sales tactics to swindle Amazon third-party sellers (or prospective sellers) into purchasing Defendants’ services.”

Pieces of the following paragraph punch much harder, though. Amazon alleges that the “Defendants accomplish their scam in part by duping consumers into believing that they are affiliated with Amazon by using Amazon’s distinctive trademarks…consumers spending thousands or tens of thousands of dollars on various programs that purportedly teach them the “secrets” to selling on Amazon. The “secrets” imparted to students involve violating Amazon’s third-party seller agreements through the use of fake product reviews and manipulation of search results to artificially drive traffic to their products.”

The lawsuit mentions domain names that contain the word “amazon” directly in the name such as,,, and At the time of this writing, the website appears much different, likely in response to the lawsuit.

Screenshot 2019 10 25 OnlineSecrets com scaled
Online Secrets’ homepage as of October 25, 2019. (source:

Part of the scheme, as Amazon states, involved coursemates viewing each other’s products and leaving reviews in an exchange-like fashion after receiving the product for free or at a steep discount.

The lawsuit also covers the amount of money the defendants sold their courses for by saying that “[when] Gazzola and Behdjou were operating Amazon Secrets, they charged students $3,999 for a three-month course. Online Secrets currently charges students $4,997 for a three-month program (the “Amazon Inner Circle” package), $6,997 for a six-month program (the “Amazon Inner Circle In It to Win It!”), or $9,997 for a one-year program (the “Amazon Inner Circle Ultra-Coaching Program”).”

We can even trace this nonsense back to January 2019, when The Atlantic ran an article about the same people Amazon is suing. In the article, the now-defendants boldly state that “anyone who loses money simply isn’t following their advice.”

In the original Atlantic article, Amazon didn’t comment on the matter but said it works closely with the FTC. Based on what we’re seeing now, it looks like Amazon’s comment is strong.

It is often a point of serious contention for those providing education in the Amazon selling space regarding the price of education. Some advocate for selling for what it’s worth (which is often massive amounts of money), and some land on the spectrum south of that, even including at no cost. This won’t be the last time we hear about an e-commerce guru peddling their wares and being the target of frustration and complaints about not upholding their end of the deal.

I think this: there’s not enough special information for anything Amazon-related worth five figures that’s not proprietary or confidential. Every course maker will likely be offering variations of the same information. There are no dirty secrets to striking it rich in the Amazon marketplace. Selling and being successful requires a lot of hard work, time, and money. Join some Facebook groups, comb YouTube, hell, even email me (I won’t charge you a penny). Whatever you do, don’t spend $9,000 on a course. If you do, and things start falling apart (like in the complaints earlier in this post), charge it back. Otherwise, you’ll probably never see that money again and have nothing to show for it.

(special thanks to Domain Name Wire for the original stories)


The Seller Journal may receive a commission from purchases made through links in this post. Click here to learn more about how we treat affiliate links and content that contains them. As an Amazon Associate, The Seller Journal earns from qualifying purchases.